I think to protect any space to think, there needs to be peace, whether that space can be shared with all, remains to be the question, I think the internet has proven that all can be at peace online together, it seems to be the issue of what thoughts are occurring for each one of us, and how, along what lines.

There are different levels of thinking like common sense (how to think about things in a positive way, or recognize whats appropriate or inappropriate) and higher ordered thinking (research, writing, medicine, therapy, law, tech), enlightened forms of thinking (quotes), teaching (explaining and getting people to think well without telling everyone everything or how to assemble their own work), and learning (what we know, what we learn, how we apply what we know and learn to our current lives or thinking and how we either pick up or don’t remember what we learn, and what is later applied or shown through our work).

This is obviously the issue, protecting those processes, while remaining silent (speakeasy) on concepts like conspiracy, crime, war, terrorism, and mass shootings.

I don’t think a street way of thinking means that if we are made aware of things in the news that we should be made to be uncomfortable in our surroundings or fearful in our daily lives, but trauma happens, so know your tolerance for these things, and if you are sensitive to content, then expose yourself less to sources of content or controversy that affect your thinking about things whether that be street, music, film, entertainment, comedy, news, learning, research, writing, philosophy, quotes, you name it.

What do you need to keep separate from what in your mind, then we get to the control and complaint aspect of writing that is accepted well in numbers like my blog in stages numbers were high and Alexa was high, in what ways does information work with other types of information and in what ways does it not?

I think when we hear of crime we are prone to analyzing crime with a street base of knowledge, which isn’t always true, the rumored understanding of things is between people, not transcribed online, if its an interpretation of a person and not in writing, then it is not known or memorizable on the basis of knowing a person, known by someone who doesn’t know me by looking at me, therefore there is no transference of an understanding to which anyone unattached to me would be made awake to any state of brilliance or knowledge leading them to act in a way that they are disturbed or disturbing to others, violent.

How does mental disturbance occur, it occurs by abuse, people being too close to you, opening up and then not feeling good and being ignored, or rejection, or frustrated being misinterpreted is mental disturbance. Violence is not mental disturbance, it’s a person taking their anger out on another or other human being, so where does violence come from?

Is self-harm violence, self-harm is not violence because it is not anger that is taken out on another human being, its frustration and feeling insulted and bullied, that causes the body pain and the head mental distress, and when the mind and body can’t function, that causes self-harm a reaction to stop the pain or the bullying that is occurring to the body of a person, who is suffering.

Self-harm functions to stop pain, so to stop self-harm, one has to figure out what is causing them pain, or voices bullying them, to stop the bullying from occurring, that is causing them pain. The color of your skin doesn’t make you have anything in common with White Supremacy, nor does a “White Lives Matter Campaign” what is a extreme ideology that was in existence prior to the 60’s was based on a philosophy in life to not make people exist, therefore the existence of people who don’t want peoples to exist is not a proper philosophy in life to be followed by any race or any human, we have evolved beyond the necessity for destruction of others or our own lives, we are living in a period in which people are provided for, taken care of, government is supporting, and people are earning higher wages, we are in a period of growth, therefore no one alive during my lifetime, should be upset by any improvements or technological advancements, maybe its old philosophies are still carried within people who were raised that way, and if you can’t stop the problem of what people live by, then that doesn’t mean that a solution cannot be written to help prevent mass shootings, on the basis of “street knowledge.”: