Removed Post

Excerpt from an upcoming article in Level 21 Magazine (my writing today affected by calling the detective to update him on the hate website of misinformation):

“Game Theory is “the study of interactive decisions,” describing our interactions as humans, social creatures, “who interact with their environments.” This theory “enables us to understand the roles that emotions and other behavioral characteristics have within a context of social interaction.” [4] When our critical mode of thinking is geared by our exposure this can in turn affect “how we order things in our lives. [and] how we engineer relationships,” and most of all “how we address problems in our society.” Game theory refers to the “possible interactions between two or more Rational Agents,” what defines a rational agent. A “Rational Agent,” is one who holds the same or similar beliefs, and this can occur when we are informed equally and have access to the same information, such as what social media provides, an open ended network of ideas and exposures, from which a feeling or idea can be derived from exposure to. How else would you know how others are doing had you not heard from them, doesn’t not hearing from others contribute to so much unnecessary worry in life. If the goal of participation and interaction online is to feel well, and to achieve a sense of peace from being exposed to one another, then that’s the end goal, being able to achieve, feel lifted, not downtrodden about life, or deflated, so to speak. You would think that participation includes possessing an account and sharing online, but we forget that some just read, so the pressure doesn’t go both ways when it comes to accountability, just what is present online, gets used to decipher fact from fiction, and that’s the problem. What you think when you hear or see something, will not always be the same as what another hears or thinks, but if the tendency is geared toward arriving to negatives, then that’s how the information will be interpreted, until a negative point of interest is arrived to, and anything that can support that derivative of those deductions, meaning how a person looks, sounds, what they’re wearing, and who they are talking to, there is no joy, in any element of harm, and when trying to lighten up a conversation on violence, gun violence, sexuality, and age, sometimes we rely on presenting our best selves to address discomfort.

The main lesson is to learn to separate yourself from any “game” in life, or series of understandings, or misunderstandings about life, and how things occur, may have occurred, or unravel the mystery behind the elements of problems, contributory, and preventable basis for choices made by others, which can only be determined based upon what a person says is their basis for a decision made, without alluding to people as being bases. Without a person admitting to what they think guiding their negative impulse toward a person or group of persons in life. If we don’t know that much about life, then we can’t assume what is influencing the decisions of others, foul or for social good. When thinking about life, observe what you can, that doesn’t mean that your exposures in life, hold you responsible for what you assemble in your mind to be true about people, what they have said, or what images they have shown. Like all Instagrams, its just a summary of that persons reactions and informations known to them at that point in time, and to all those who have witnessed or been influenced by those periods in time, or wellness or sickness, we all endure changes in life that subject us to being affected by the wellness of others, lacking, or apparent, that will never change about human nature. Its about what ideas you are willing to accept, and what you stay patient to, either expecting a certain wellness achieved and present, or wrongfully assume someone is not well by their own doing, or someone else’s. Whenever there is a fight over influence, its about whats working and whats not working, so for anyone to establish an element or person is not to be included to the elements of the game of “references” working for everyone, is to not only not include them for reference for solution, but also to declare someone is not a member of the solution that is present and working in the minds of others. How can you discriminate a person from solution, if you are using them as an element to dictate a series of themes or understanding to a game of “insult” you seek to rise to the towers of our mind for reference if foully insinuated. If anyone cares, I have always cared, I flew to DC 2013, signed a bunch of books by Senators offices, visited The US Supreme Court, and The White House, and navigated through how to help others by getting involved and introducing myself to organizations who are helping others, referenced to me 2011, before any shooting happened, and that was my introduction to gun violence and advocacy, so I was told to “keep in general” by Brady, and it was also recommended to continue applying for jobs, and I have done everything to that extent of their preferences for how we should support them, keep it general. So don’t treat me as some fraud or person who is not who they say they are, I am the only blogger online with a celebrity reference connection, who blogs online, and is also connected to a anti-gun violence organization, and who also graduated from law school and began attending 2008. So don’t treat me as though my cares are new and trendy, my cares have always been this way since I was a crisis hotline counselor 2004, trained and certified, so don’t go through my resume, and wrongfully accuse me of things you think run counter to some job or exposure Ive had in the past, on the basis of pictures you have acquired and none made during the time I was working for those organizations.”

Still editing will try to “keep in general” and stay in the solution, not go into mental illness over this person trying to affect my mentality and focus, and positive virtues in life, meaning demeanor, face structure, tone, and identity face, wellness.