Prevention when it comes to gun violence is about creating for making for way for a peace that reasons beyond any instinct to deviate from any channel of wellness or route toward a more happy existence. I think the over obsession with analyzing the guilty leave more room for error and causes more harm than good to try to understand offenders, maybe that helps people to identify traits discriminate and believe in an ability to identify a harm before it occurs but rarely is that the case, mostly noted in the news recently.

Not all crimes are learning experiences for furthering any understanding of life sometimes it does more harm than good to focus on something bad and expect for good feelings to occur for people in their lives outlook or sense of what life is like should be like or could be like.

It would be better to focus on the victims and the ways in which they were controlled manipulated or targeted and not allow for any woman any look any ability to appear well or not be factored or taught as a condition that any other woman or set of ideas or beliefs or philosophies are based to say a wrong is demonstrated in a look that you feel is wrongfully represented by any figure in life to say that a composite of dislike appears on who is well as a result of a person who appears happy pure and with a good life try to blame and compare and attach circumstances to justify a misthinking or a reason or rationale for a crime occurring.

Don’t use people to explain crime motives or justifications each person is connected to themselves their lives and what they know and nothing that anyone reads or sees is an accurate position or identity for blame to justify attacks or reject for the purposes of declaring or creating a popular condition you are convinced or think should convince others is rejection or cause for attack. This is the main point … whether a person is attacked as a high likelihood of attack to say a person has a condition known that can’t function survive to accuse a person known of exposing others to an identity that doesn’t work function in the minds of others or accuse a popular writer of duplicating a condition or mental health or writing that you think disturbs people mentally or causes sickness or accuse of making bad people feel good or smart, and seek to justify establishing basis for attack to see what issues are made aware to me if I’m told that if I get voices that means I should be attacked in real life now they want to know in what ways can prevention occur through blogging if you now are declared a person who gets attacked. Or convinced people you are for attack defective or schizophenic, I think the only dilemma is that people feel bad or think that they’re reading something sick and be falsely convinced they caught schizophrenia is not appropriate to hurt the feelings of people who read or know me and convince them I’m sick to try to establish that I’m sick or accuse me of making bad people feel good I think if you feel good and think I’m bad that’s a different reaction from a criminal who thinks bad to accuse me of feeling good or sounding good to a criminal to try to argue that me feeling bad or sick if it makes hate feel good try to argue that that’s formula for making criminals feel good. Whatever was the experiment prevention will always be by FEMA trainings anything anyone can’t figure out anything anyone becomes reliant on the other whatever seems can’t be reversed simply write to the courts whenever there is a feeling not stated no matter what harm is caused to me is my job personally however a bigger cause to worry about would be prevention and not speak to the unnecessary people are prosecutorial and read don’t tell you they’re reading and pretend like they’re you to see if you get jealous can tell theyre reading that’s a different issue, when it comes to crime there is no solution until you stop going by others and not ruin systems of support that are not based on teaching people to exclude or overfocused on crime and excusing crime by blaming people their lives or timelines are contributing affected a reaction or result of a person their life or what they say.

No code is so well known that anyone should seek to understand how a feeling or crime occurs or mass shooting I think the manipulation of facts about a person is to use entertainment to say is a reflection of me when it’s not … however my life is privately managed or what is said most people can’t help you with difficulty and if it’s about prevention that can occur by speaking to the courts then you can’t rely on others to help you and it’s up to you to make sense as a platform to 1 billion now.

Anything you say comes back to you in life is the experiment so if that’s the basis for religion it would be a good idea to not say things to come back to you and hurt you or explain others and allow yourself to get hurt or cause a fight or anything stated would not be the solution for it not to occur to you or come from anywhere where you can be convinced someone is you and you’re not you by reading your work to experiment with whether you can help yourself or only good at helping others. I think people help themselves, and what goes wrong usually there is nothing to say to undo fix that feeling and it now takes everyone a long time to regain clarity and confidence in things going right again that’s up to you, no one else.