There are many factors to weigh in the event that there is a medical emergency or a mental health crisis, first would be to measure the number of people sick, by which diagnosis and medication, and to monitor the progress of patients, and at which periods, months, do hospitalizations peak. The first thing would be to decide in what way do people diagnosed with mental health conditions, in what way are people with known disorders used to judge the severity of mental health issues existing in others.

As a blogger I have had the rare opportunity, to write books, not yet an author officially, recover, work, and improve and be able to share along the way what advice for building a blog, blogging tips, narrative examples of what Im thinking, solutions for thinking that are easy to read and suit the minds of people concerned about right now, and come up with content that is relatable or easy enough to read that it has received likes or rank, among the authors writing online, to stand out as someone who is unique and who’s content is worth the few minutes of reading, most people will not read things that are not worth their time, which means that more often than not, people feel motivated to read my work, and that their return to reading, or not, illustrates the impact of one post, being sufficient for getting to know me, and can either attest to what others are capable of in spite of reading my work, versus people being independent themselves and not requiring to read my work on a daily basis, to get a feel for how things are or to be given any type of emergency care that makes or breaks their status mental health wise.

In talking to Justice Sotomayor on messenger, I have already begun to address the implementation of a system for determining risk, and what are the variables for assessment.

This would be to assess what has been done, what work is being done, what am I doing, what does my timeline look like, what does my health look like, first in relation to how other patients are doing, and secondly as a popular blogger in relation to how Im feeling, and what is a true and accurate reflection of how other people are doing.

The best assessment of right now, would be something said that is settling, the opposite of what would be found to be the solution would be upset, sickness, mental illness, non performance, avoidance, non-disclosure, failure, limitations, relationships, lawsuits, blogs, twitter, photography, Instagram, if what needs to be weighed is the value of the content, that would be for the basis of which content is being reviewed as inflicting information to anyone to change them, or whether information created is coming from someone who is well and professional.

It will only matter whether information is controlling, if it is being viewed that something is going wrong as a result of your information being communicated. As risk is being viewed as having occurred on the basis of your communications at all times, and on the basis of others being insulted by what you have to say, which means that people want to hear directly on a subject to know what you are well by, to make sure that you are not sick, or avoidant, or bottling up, or secreting any information from the public, that if the public knew that they would feel better.

This is how you know when private conversations will not suffice to make things better, when people are demanding for their right to know what is wrong in order to figure out what is going wrong for others. Specifically they want to know in what way are things working out for you, how do you respond post incident, and in what way are you given permissions to move forward, without having done anything wrong or missed an issue or not have lead conversations with prevention in mind, and lived absent problems up until the date of the incident and afterward.

There is a certain level of success in thinking that must be exhibited by anyone who seeks to prevent a specific crime, and if it is something that is thought, then now it is clear that it will be something that is expected to be explained, or else punishment may occur in the form of not creating a work or documentation that demonstrates for solution moving forward.

We now know that when a problem is being identified and when a problem is being identified as a source of blame for a changed condition in a person, the identification of what was done wrong to a person, is viewed as the fault of the person who has been harmed. Therefore if the person who has been harmed continues to feel sick, there will a feeling of insufficiency to reverse the consequences and disablement of a portrayal made about a person, who you then say is deserved or a repercussion of a person not caring or being controlled by another and embarrassed.

It will be by a demonstration of what is considered a poor choice, will then become the basis for being used to analyze a person’s influence in relation to things going right, credited or discredited.

This is how peoples lives are used and judged in the negative to argue that people are being bad, or communications are bad, or the basis for a persons talking points, or manner of conversation or contacts are bad, when a person is reviewed a solution cannot be found by a third party, this puts people at risk of harm, for being viewed as wrong, when people who do not have the potential to write research papers or to explain for their feelings or what they think, don’t speak, and wrongfully bestow powers to people who don’t speak, to punish people who do speak, is not proper methodology for ensuring justice of opinions or rationalizing whats going wrong in any state, for any reason, by any age group, in any school, in any race, or any disability.

A solution will always be sought in the event that there is a Gun Violence problem or a mental health issue problem, and what will need to be seen is the value of the content that is being provided overall, who the audience is, the purpose for use of the information, the degree to which is helps in a non-biased way, the degree to which any content is argumentative or seeking to defend or justify any decision being viewed as defending what will want to be known, will be what are the causes for openness, what are the causes for not having a firm grasp on what you are thinking, or what anyone is thinking, and that therefore creates a vulnerability, when people stop fighting and an opportunity to say something in place of argument and insult that reinforces peoples need for privacy, not be subjected to criticism, and not take personally what they identify as being about you or not.

In the end when you believe that something is about you, it will not be the portrayals in common that are creating for disease, it will be the pressure instilled upon a person who is known, by those who seek for a scientific evaluation of the relationship between then crime, and mental health, and stability, and success rates in life, to weigh what are the outside conditioning factors to be weighed, what are the reactions, and what is a matter of you, and what are you responsible for or what is being weighed against you in life, including peoples opinions.

Peoples opinions of you will carry weight in moments that you are vulnerable, it is in vulnerability that people think they are stronger and smarter than you and that’s how you lose your power and you are removed from an equation, its about respect and people feeling and demanding the need to defend themselves and punish anyone who they do not want to assume the fault for injuring, this is how people get injured who work hard or express preoccupation or busyness in life, that others take personally, for not having the time and energy to engage, people want attention, then they don’t need you, and if you don’t give people attention, its falsely communicates that you are not paying attention or jealous because you think you are better than others.

People want attention who want you to think that they have it better than you, to make people feel like they have it better, is when people are introduced who are respected on different basis, and made to be viewed together, to know who is the right choice, who is mature, and what the right decision is, love or friendship doesn’t matter when it comes to sickness.

It’s when you cannot perform that you are not needed, and often times people make choices on the basis of who they think is doing okay and strong on their own, while helping those who they feel more comfortable helping, this is how you can miss opportunities in life, being too independent.

People want to know whether you are someone who helps others, or needs help, and without proof of you helping others in a non-biased way, different facts about your story reactions or demeanors will be used to make you seem like you don’t belong, or less light or bolded around others and think that you notice others, and don’t notice yourself as someone who is noticeable, is how misinterpreted who there is a desired intimacy for and with, versus which types of women don’t do that with people, there are different ways that people respect people, some ways don’t show in interaction.

System of Prevention (as it relates to my life):

Timeline:

• Incident (2) Functionality (3) Decision (4) Action (5) Placement (6) Court or Police (7) Mental Health (8) Ability to Move On (9) Photos or Lifestyle (10) Sobriety (11) Medications
  • Incident, in Law School, Meeting with Deans, Flew to DC for 2 weeks, visited scotus.
  • Dated, dumped with a job in DC, didn’t take two finals, got an A and a Witken, then finished my Paralegal Certificate and didn’t finish Law School.
  • 2009, didn’t get into Law School, applied for a job at the Navy, committed suicide.
  • Had friends in contact with friends up until 2015 and 2017 last time I saw friends.
  • Dating, dated 2007-2013, and didn’t finish Law School on the basis of disability.
  • Incident, Response, Recorded writing and talking points, reaction sought similar.
  • Prevention being, needs to occur before an incident in order to stop an incident.
  • Prevention is not viewed as existing if you appear in court after an incident.
  • An incident will no make sense to have affected you or what prompted you to help or to appear, will not make sense on the basis of where you were, what grades you had.
  • What prompts a person to speak to court, left with a problem they cannot solve would be if I was hurt, writing from #laxcourthouse. Writing and taking notes in court, that’s me having a problem separate from court, and after appearing making the decision to help, by discontinuing my JD, and focusing on my health and start working finish an MSL.
  • It is not until there are attacks, that you submit a research proposal to work on a strategy to prevent the repetition of incidences by not allowing for people to be prompted by anyone or any crime or any code or any person, as aligned or strengthen by wrongfully.
• How to Implement Prevention where non-exist Public: Follow the order of events occurring 2013, and write to the same court that you have met and responded to in the past, and on the basis of you improving, means both the conscious of anyone who knows you including yourself is not met with an energy or pressure for explanation or creating of any viewpoint in defense of self that should shatter your image, innocence, or mental health, its in selfishness that people act in defense, and how a disability or a low functionality is determined to exist in you, the basis for not impressing others and not doing well, becomes the basis for not belonging is the lesson that is being taught or is expected to be the reason past, with expectation for being caused future. There is a similar delay or a length of time sought for suffering to amount to things appearing as though a long delay, or serious psychiatric issue, is about people thinking things are your fault, and then to blame you as a person who is attacked, to say that if you are attacked then you don’t belong to be known, because they don’t believe you are apart of prevention, which are all the actions and writings and steps taking post to ensure that things don’t happen, so that is what people want to see, and understand, they want a written system of responding that works, proof that it works, and also a reassessment of whats current, a prevention  strategy for addressing the death of people by Gun Violence and what can be done known to all to prevent these incidences from occurring, including what is happening before and after, know.
• How to Predict the Chances for Gun Violence: First figure out who is being examined weighed and calculated as a person who is attacked or has been attacked and what has been done to them, then come up with a system for establishing blame, and recording on what basis is blame being interpreted or thought to exist, and make sure that an existence of perceived guilt is not something that is leading the people, to then feel bad about a treatment of a person, who they believe not to care for on the basis of any guilt they assume, and to make sure that people who do not help or think poorly of people, make sure that what is happening for a person or what they are being blamed for matches what is occurring in reality, and make sure that a person is not identified without them knowing it, that people think that things are their fault and by what action or inaction or fact photograph, poster, phone call or report, it will be what is known or said will be the information that people use to say that what you have to report, preceding an incident argue that what you know is what doesn’t work out, to blame what you know for things not working out, and assume that you are reporting something of concern to you, that people later say is of concern to them, and want to know in what way are you representing facts to incorporate others expressions of imagery, and what is being made about it. Its on the basis of making a poster about me and reported, maybe was not related to Gun Violence in Colorado, or the green tie worn by an Attorney to the incident, but because I kept those photos and noted those expression that people want to know what is the connection between me and a incident, and in what way was the green tie miscommunicating to identify to me as someone with mental health issues who is known, with a card photograph with a green ribbon in my hair, in what way was that not confrontational, and in what way is a perceived confrontation thought to exist as to my identity, from what story and by what terms, it will be by terms you think are being used to reference me, will be the basis for which you seek to blame me as someone who you think is being fought or referenced to then blame me or further blame me by race, and incapable of preventing a criminal from committing an act of violence or Gun Violence on the basis of them not liking me by religion or by photograph, so that is using me as person who you blame and then inflict guilt without saying, to explain for a criminal, to say thatv they know me or are referencing me, to misunderstand and empower the wrong people to feel right about their acts. When you see and hear things and think of me, I cant control who tells you whether I am someone to respect or someone to not respect, and whatever demonstration hateful or criminal, is not a true connection of me to them, that I should be responsible for their sickness illness or actions, I am not someone who has done nothing, or acts like I deserve something better than I have, or acts like I know more than anyone, I think people think they know how crime occurs and continue to blame people who are known for crimes that occur. What can be prevented would be the argument in favor of people who commit crimes, and to argue that I have mental illness or treat criminals as being smarter than me, to argue that I am stupid and say that I am missing a point somewhere in the 10 years that Ive been working at home, to declare that some influence coming from me, is wrong, to justify a sickness, to create a non-existent guilt, to explain for the mental illness carried by another, would be to argue for a condition that is “convinced of” and arguments for a “convinced of” condition is to assert that a person has a way of talking that doesn’t work or is wrong, or reflects a wrong that turns others off, so this is how you justify how a person becomes an offender, would be to label someone as an offender, to the argue that a person labeled an offender is who caused a person to become an offender. This is not something Ive not thought about, in fact it works in the reverse an offenders life is improved and they experience clarity hurting someone who is good, and making people look stupid, is what makes an offender feel smart, its actually an exchange that causes you to view the offender as innocent and on the basis of whats done to a person, believe is deserved. Justifying that a treatment is deserved will be to create for some believe that some overall conclusion was arrived to without a person speaking to or evidenced through their appearance or talking points or conversation or mental health status, that asserts or confirms that a person knows less than other people, and that because people who are not them, know more, argue that a person is well without having known a person, when they improve, to cause sickness, would be negating the argument of a offender quality being passed from a person who is identified as good, that a better state of mind is achieved, to argue works on a person who directly offends them feels better, and the original offense is not alarming makes sense and is not a big deal, while not accounting for what can occur in the event that a condition is continued that created for the first offense, would be to reinforce what an offender thinks while evaluating what types of conditions conversations or reactions occur in a woman, who is treated as being at fault, at what point should one recognize that who offended them is being supported and in what ways is a desired outcome being sought to reinforce the passing of a condition worse to explain for a worsening condition in another, in what ways are you being manipulated or changed to either not benefit you, benefit others, be used, supported, or not helped, and in what ways does that help to prove or disprove whether a condition is passed to explain for. I think by crime, being on IMDBpro, means that Im aware of who I am I know my story they know my content, therefore there has already been an addressed effort to ensure that no content is misbelieved to be in support of or not in support of me, to explain for a targeted shooting.
• Analyzing the Value of a Prior Writing: A prior writing can be used to confirm or disprove the existence of a thought known, and be later used to determine the value of that thought as accepted as existing and a reflection, or not existing and thought and not an accurate depiction of what is occurring, will be of greater value later, if it relates to something that is occurring now. In what way does relating a previous writing to the present what type of fact does that seek to establish. I think a prior writing can be used to direct and reinforce a condition to argue that a similar circumstance has occurred to blame a person for content exposure inappropriate to explain for an incident of Gun Violence as being a product of something visually wrong with a person, not shown to the public, or an image that is not proper or the reason for a dislike, when a writing is reinforced by what I look like read, then that’s confirmation that it’s not by what I look like that Im being found to be offensive, then it will be the quality of my content that is being sought as being accurate or true and the purpose for a thought, in relation to different elements and different areas of life, want to know how do my thoughts interact with others, to determine whether there is something scientifically wrong with me that automatically doesn’t interact well with others, to say that Gun Violence is a product of a poor interaction, or to illustrate a cause for mental illness, as existing in a person unrelated, just to evaluate in words the quality of a writing, or status of health, to decide what characteristic or behavior or face is not interacting well and on what basis, will be the determination for bullying as justified, or lawsuit as justified, it will be whether until a fight occurs that is mental illness, or whether when a fight occurs anyone is suicidal, and what needs to be said is to not make a fight occur toward one person, would be one strategy toward not making a fight occur justified to anybody.

• Messages to Justice Sotomayor (Factors to Weigh the Significance and Later Use of a Prior Writing, for Determining What is Occurring for Whom and Why, and What is Real, or a Result of Something Said, Whether a new or different condition exists on the speaker, or a viewer, and in what way should the result be so positive that both influence and crime is deterred by writing:

Draft of Argument Sent to Justice Sotomayor in Advance (Prevention Plan #1 – Listed)

Guessing the Issue and the Issue that Evolves   

Elaborated Problem, More True, or Identification of what is, or an unreal thought, a layer applicable application. -So its good to identify.

May help later, responsibility for, elaborated problems or prevention, Whats anticipation to come, is Identification of what is, or not real whats to come. Elaboration means to not leave stuck thinking to bring things to a close full identification to spare time.Eliminates focus, by doing work for focus, focus on other things.Intelligence comes to you, if not left focus on hurt mind gets permission to feel good think absent, or nothing coming to you, create it to give self permission to think clear of. How responsible is a person who gets hurt how does sorry solve getting hurt it frees who hurt you lets people get away feeling good they think right are right and to make you wrong hurt you.

Sorry works + solution, no hurt to teller or expector.